Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 496 P2D 389 - Freshour v. Turner

Freshour v. Turner’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
April 1993
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently April 1993

2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

80197219801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gault · Lamb v. Brown · Baker & Strawn v. Magnolia Petroleum Co. · Nicodemus v. District Court of Oklahoma County · Schaffer v. Green

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We note there is nothing contained within either the title to the act or within House Bill Number 1705 itself making the particular act retroactive. It is well established that unless a legislative enactment by its very own language is to apply retroactively, it can apply prospectively only. Acme Oil & Gas Co., Limited, et al. v. Cooper, Judge, 168 Okl. 346 , 33 P.2d 191 ; Baker & Strawn v. Magnolia Petroleum Co., 124 Okl. 94 , 254 P. 26 , 82 C.J.S. Statutes § 319.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"The net effect of the two decisions above cited [Lamb and Schaffer] was to leave the Children's Code devoid of any definition of `child' and `delinquent child,' or any legally established age at which a person must have a hearing in Juvenile Division of the District Court before being certified for adult proceedings."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “any male child under the age of sixteen years and any female child under the age of eighteen years.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.