Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

496 So. 2d 137

496 So.2d 137

11 Fla.L.Weekly 548

Florida Bar v. Pomeroy

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 23, 1986

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1986-10-23

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1988

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1986-10-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Upon the filing of the unconditional guilty plea and consent judgment for discipline this Court appointed a referee to conduct a hearing regarding Pomeroy’s alleged misconduct. The unconditional plea for consent judgement * acknowledges his violation of Florida Bar Code of Professional Responsibility, Disciplinary Rule 1-102(A)(6). The referee recommended that Pomeroy be found guilty in accordance with his unconditional plea and that he be given a public reprimand.

¶2Neither side contests the referee’s report which we hereby adopt. Publication of this opinion in Southern Reporter will serve as the public reprimand.

¶3Judgment for costs in the amount of $500.05 is hereby entered against Pomeroy, for which sum let execution issue.

¶4It is so ordered.

McDonald, C.J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON and SHAW, JJ., concur.

¶5 We feel it unnecessary to publish the full text of the plea. The Court file is open for inspection.

/496/so2d/137 · .json · Public domain