Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 496 SO2D 394 - State v. Deboue

State v. Deboue’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 2018

20 state decisions

1101986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Brady v. State of Maryland · Sheppard v. Maxwell · State v. Sepulvado · 446 So. 2d 729 - State v. Prudholm

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the appellate court finds that the prosecutor's argument contained improper remarks, a reversal is warranted only if the court is thoroughly convinced that the jury was influenced by the remarks and that they contributed to the verdict. State v. Jarman, 445 So.2d 1184 (La.1984). Credit should be accorded to the good senses and fairmindedness of jurors who have heard the evidence. State v. Dupre, 408 So.2d 1229 (La.1982); State v. Deboue, [ 496 So.2d 394 (La.App. 4 Cir.1986), writ denied, 501 So.2d 229 (La.1987).]”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he opening statement of the State shall explain the nature of the charge, and set forth, in general terms, the nature of the evidence by which the State expects to prove the charge.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “... shall be confined to evidence admitted, to the lack of evidence, to conclusions of fact that the state or defendant may draw therefrom, and to the law applicable to the case.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.