496 So. 2d 894 - Falzone v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 475 So. 2d 1218 - Hendrix v. State · Joyner v. State · 468 So. 2d 1100 - Hunt v. State · 468 So. 2d 220 - Florida Bar: Amendment to Rules of Criminal Procedure (3.701, 3.988—Sentencing Guidelines) · 490 So. 2d 190 - Frank v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[u]se of the guidelines presupposes that all pertinent information concerning the defendant has been considered in determining the proper length of his sentence.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“defined under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(5)(a), as those offenses which were committed before the primary offense at conviction and for which convictions were also obtained. Following from that definition, the courts in those cases held that such subsequent criminal conduct not factored as”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Patten v. State“[A]ny past criminal conduct on the part of the offender, resulting in conviction, prior to the commission of the primary offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.