Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 496 U.S. 292 - Illinois v. Perkins

Illinois v. Perkins’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

1,268
cited by 1,268 later decisions
21
cited 21 times by the Supreme Court
41
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

263 federal appellate · 99 district · 590 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,268 later decisions (21 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2026 · most notably Arizona v. Fulminante (1991), Stansbury v. California (1994)

263 federal appellate · 99 district · 590 state decisions — followed in 41 states

52301990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Edwards v. Arizona · Rhode Island v. Innis · Berkemer v. McCarty · Mincey v. Arizona

Cited together with Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Rhode Island v. Innis · Berkemer v. McCarty · Edwards v. Arizona · Moran v. Burbine

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,268 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is the premise of Miranda that the danger of coercion results from the interaction of custody and official interrogation.”
    63 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the danger of coercion result[ing] from the interaction of custody and official interrogation.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Nothing in the Court’s opinion suggests that, had respondent previously invoked his Fifth Amendment right to counsel or right to silence, his statements would be admissible. If respondent had invoked either right, the inquiry would focus on whether he subsequently waived the particular right.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.