Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 496 U.S. 582 - Pennsylvania v. Muniz

Pennsylvania v. Muniz’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

1,475
cited by 1,475 later decisions
27
cited 27 times by the Supreme Court
45
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

248 federal appellate · 115 district · 750 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,475 later decisions (27 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2025 · most notably McNeil v. Wisconsin (1991), Arizona v. Evans (1995)

248 federal appellate · 115 district · 750 state decisions — followed in 45 states

53101990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · United States v. Wade · Schmerber v. State of California · Griffin v. California · Rhode Island v. Innis

Cited together with Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Rhode Island v. Innis · Schmerber v. State of California · Edwards v. Arizona · Doe v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,475 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “biographical data necessary to complete booking or pretrial services.”
    64 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “any words or actions on the part of the police (other than those normally attendant to arrest and custody ) that the police should know are reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response from the suspect.”
    18 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the police may not ask questions, even during booking, that are designed to elicit incriminatory admissions”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.