Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 497 F.2d 1092 - Stark v. Weinberger

Stark v. Weinberger’s Empirical Analysis

497 F.2d 1092 · 1974

Citation profile

167
cited by 167 later decisions
2
states following
December 2019
most recently cited

68 federal appellate · 9 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 167 later decisions — most recently December 2019 · most notably Parker v. Harris (1980), Marcus v. Califano (1979)

68 federal appellate · 9 district · 2 state decisions

71019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · Richardson v. Perales · Detenber v. American Universal Insurance Co · DePaepe v. Richardson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 167 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t is clear that each case must be decided on its own facts, and post-disability employment is not necessarily disqualifying in every case. The question is not simply answered by the fact of [the claimant’s] employment or the extent of her earnings. Rather, the answer turns on whether she was disabled within the meaning of the Act notwithstanding the fact that she actually did work.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[that the claimant must establish an] inability to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or which has lasted or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months ...”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “is predicated upon a 'medically accepted clinical diagnostic technique' " and whether "considered in light of the entire record, it establishes the existence of a 'physical impairment' prior to”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.