Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

497 F.2d 111

Docket No. 73-2776.

Musgrave v. Arnow

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1974-07-11

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 2007

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on United States v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. · United States v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. · Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. The Honorable Winstion E. Arnow, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1974-07-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Stephen N. Bernstein, Gainesville, Fla., for petitioners.

William H. Stafford, Jr., U.S. Atty., Pensacola, Fla., for respondents.

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and GOLDBERG and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Petitioners sought by mandamus to prevent the District Court from enforcing its order of July 12, 1973, which prohibited persons not parties to the case from making public statements during the pendency of the trial. The case has been fully tried resulting in judgments of acquittal and we therefore dismiss the request for relief as moot.1

1

For related cases see United States v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 5 Cir. 1974, 497 F.2d 102; United States v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 5 Cir. 1974, 497 F.2d 107; National Broadcasting Company, Inc. v. Arnow, 5 Cir. 1974, 497 F.2d 110; Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Arnow, 5 Cir. 1974, 497 F.2d 110

/497/f2d/111 · .json · Public domain