Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 497 F.2d 1330 - Nathaniel MOSLEY Et Al., Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION Et Al., Appellees

Nathaniel MOSLEY Et Al., Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION Et Al., Appellees’s Empirical Analysis

497 F.2d 1330 · 1974

Citation profile

198
cited by 198 later decisions
12
states following
November 2024
most recently cited

36 federal appellate · 41 district · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 198 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably Rendine v. Pantzer (1995), Alexander v. Fulton County (2000)

36 federal appellate · 41 district · 22 state decisions — followed in 12 states

570197419801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Moore v. New York Cotton Exchange · Lee v. Washington · United States v. Mississippi · Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 198 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(A) any right to relief is asserted against them jointly, severally, or in the alternative with respect to or arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences; and (B) any question of law or fact common to all defendants will arise in the action.”
    27 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'[t]ransaction' is a word of flexible meaning”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “should be construed in light of its purpose, which `is to promote trial convenience and expedite the final determination of disputes, thereby preventing multiple lawsuits.'”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.