Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 497 F.2d 563 - United States v. Reicin

United States v. Reicin’s Empirical Analysis

497 F.2d 563 · 1974

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
3
states following
December 2010
most recently cited

51 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently December 2010 · most notably United States v. Townsend (1991), 91 Ill. 2d 346 - People v. Dixon (1982)

51 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

32019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stromberg v. People of State of California · O’Callahan v. Parker, Warden · United States v. Mitchell · White v. United States · Davis v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he courts have viewed the direct accusation of the crime of perjury with considerable disfavor.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “intent to defraud does not turn on whether some of the clients 'actually' needed such treatment; it is enough that the defendant thought at the time that they did not or that he made the decision ... without regard to whether there was a need therefor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““One who acts with reckless indifference as to whether a representation is true or false is chargeable as if he had knowledge of its falsity.” Irwin v. United States, 338 F.2d 770 , 774 (C.A.9 1964).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.