In re Connors’s Empirical Analysis
497 F.3d 314 · 2007
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently September 2022
1 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 108 · 11 U.S.C. § 1322 · 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 28 U.S.C. § 157 · 28 U.S.C. § 158
Relies on United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Wright v. Union Central Life Insurance · Conklin v. Weisman · Idahoan Fresh v. Advantage Produce, Inc. · Moxley v. Comer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(b) Except as provided in subsection (a) of this section, if applicable nonbank-ruptcy law ... fixes a period within which the debtor ... may ... cure a default, or perform any other similar act, and such period has not expired before the date of the filing of the petition, the trustee 18 may only ... cure, or perform, as the case may be, before the later of— (1) the end of such period, including any suspension of such period occurring on or after the commencement of the case; or (2) 60 days after the order for relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Richter“Title III of the bill will assist homeowners. Some homeowners attempt to prevent their homes from being foreclosed upon, even though a bankruptcy court (sic) has ordered a foreclosure sale. There may be several months between the court order and the foreclosure sale. Section 301 will preempt conflicting state laws, and permit homeowners to present a plan to pay off their mortgage debt until the foreclosure sale actually occurs.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Ausburn“[ajlthough delivery of the deed conveys legal title, [In re] Randall, 263 B.R. [200,] 203 [(D.N.J.2001)], the delivery itself has been described as ‘a ministerial act, routinely performed, which does not affect the redemption rights of the parties.' ” In re Connors, 497 F.3d 314, 320-21 (3rd Cir.2007) (quoting Ziyambe, 200 B.R. 790, 796 (Bankr. D.N.J.1996)). 6 . The Illinois property code provides”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.