Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 497 F.3d 433 - DeCorte v. Jordan

DeCorte v. Jordan’s Empirical Analysis

497 F.3d 433 · 2007

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
2
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably Foster v. University of Maryland-Eastern Shore (2015), Willis v. Cleo Corp. (2014)

7 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

220200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 1981A · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. · Landgraf v. USI Film Products · Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois · United Steelworkers of America v. Weber

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A plaintiff who has a cause of action against an employer, employment agency, or labor organization for a violation of this Chapter may file a civil suit in a district court seeking compensatory damages, back pay, benefits, reinstatement, or if appropriate, front pay, reasonable attorney fees, and court costs”. 6 . Section 102 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 allows”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.