Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 497 F.3d 584 - Lowery v. Euverard

Lowery v. Euverard’s Empirical Analysis

497 F.3d 584 · 2007

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
1
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably Doninger v. Niehoff (2011), Doninger ex rel. Doninger v. Niehoff (2008)

13 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

300200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois · Connick v. Myers · Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District · Wood v. Strickland · Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “School officials have an affirmative duty to not only ameliorate the harmful effects of disruptions, but to prevent them from happening in the first place.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “desire to avoid the discomfort and unpleasantness that always accompany an unpopular viewpoint”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “By choosing to 'go out for the team,' " student athletes like B.L. do "voluntarily subject themselves to a degree of regulation even higher than that imposed on students generally.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.