Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 497 F.3d 695 - Foster v. Hill

Foster v. Hill’s Empirical Analysis

497 F.3d 695 · 2007

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
December 2022
most recently cited

1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 2022

1 state decisions

40200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1447 · 28 U.S.C. § 2679

Relies on Quackenbush California Insurance Commissioner v. Allstate Insurance Co · Thermtron Products, Inc. v. Hermansdorfer · Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca · Gutierrez De Martinez v. Lamagno · Westfall v. Erwin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the United States is substituted as the defendant, the remedy against the United States is the exclusive remedy and any other action (specifically, any action against the defendant in his or her individual capacity) is precluded.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.