Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 497 N.E.2d 259 - Warner v. State

Warner v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
February 2014
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 2014

12 state decisions

601986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sanders v. State · Woods v. State · Sering v. State · Northern Indiana Bank & Trust Co. v. State Board of Finance · Pennington v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(1) Alcohol; (2) A controlled substance; (3) Any drug other than alcohol or a controlled substance; or (4) Any combination of alcohol, controlled substances, or drugs; such that there is an impaired condition of thought and action and the loss of normal control of a person’s faculties to such an extent as to endanger any person.” I.C. 9-11-1-5 (Burns Code Ed. Supp.1986).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'Prima facie evidence of intoxication' includes evidence that at the time of an alleged violation there was at least ten-hundredths percent (0.10%) by weight of alcohol in the person's blood.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “such that there [was] an impaired condition of thought and action and the loss of normal control of [the driver's] faculties to such an extent as to endanger any person.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.