Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 497 NW2D 437 - Duffy v. Mortenson

Duffy v. Mortenson’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
July 2002
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ward v. Fletcher · Warne v. Noonan · Thorsness v. Daschle · Stellner v. Woods

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This court’s scope of review in examining ballots is found in SDCL 12-21-57 which provides in part that “the court may review completely all of the proceedings ... relative to such recount ... and correct any errors made in the determination of questions as to validity of ballots, and in computation of returns, and any errors which may be manifest from such certifications.” Accordingly, our scope of review is de novo.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “not the policy of this state to disenfranchise a voter because of an election official's mistake or negligence, but rather, 'to determine and carry out the intent of the elector when satisfied that the elector has endeavored to express such intent in the manner prescribed by law[.]'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.