Arceneaux v. Copes’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Eusant v. Unity Industrial Life Ins., Etc., Ass'n · 448 So. 2d 1268 - Jones v. Soileau · 307 So. 2d 287 - Robinson v. Goudchaux's · 313 So. 2d 812 - Johnson v. Pearce · 412 So. 2d 620 - Young Oil Co. of La., Inc. v. Durbin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In deciding whether or not probable cause was present in a given situation, the trier of fact must examine the particular facts of the case and determine if the circumstances were such as to create an honest and reasonable belief, in the mind of the defendant, that the prosecuted party was guilty of the crime charged. Jones v. Soileau, [ 448 So.2d 1268 (La.1984) ] supra; Coleman v. Kroger Co., 371 So.2d 1186 (La.App. 1st Cir.1979), writ denied, 372 So.2d 1041 (La.1979); Jefferson v. S.S. Kresge Co., 344 So.2d 1118 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1977). [[Image here]] As to malice, this element exists when charges and allegations are known to be false, where there is lack of probable cause for filing the charges, or where the lack of probable cause results from a wanton and reckless disregard of the rights of the aggrieved party.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Guillot v. Dockens
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.