497 So. 2d 12 - State v. Stevens’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 1997
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 338 So. 2d 584 - State v. Crosby · State v. Ruth · 477 So. 2d 893 - State v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Code of Criminal Procedure Article 912(A) provides that only a final judgment or ruling is appealable. In the instant case, no final ruling as to defendant's guilt has been made. Pursuant to La. R.S. 40:983, further proceedings have been deferred and upon fulfillment of the terms and conditions of her probation, defendant shall be discharged and the charges against her shall be dismissed. Ex Proprio Motu we deny jurisdiction over this appeal, State v. Ruth, 470 So.2d 167 (La.App. 4th Cir.1985) and shall treat this matter as an application for supervisory writs. Id. at 13.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Watkins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.