497 So. 2d 2 - State v. Bloom’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
63 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 65 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2018 · most notably 761 So. 2d 1055 - Freeman v. State (2000), State v. Cotton (2000)
63 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Tamotsu Tanaka v. Creditors' Committee 1 · Sireci v. Florida · 399 So. 2d 964 - Sireci v. State · United States v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] writ of prohibition is the appropriate remedy when a trial court attempts to interfere with the prosecutorial discretion of a state attorney. See Cleveland v. State, 417 So.2d 653 (Fla. 1982). Under Florida's constitution, the decision to charge and prosecute is an executive responsibility, and the state attorney has complete discretion in deciding whether and how to prosecute. Art. II, § 3, Fla. Const.; Cleveland ; State v. Cain, 381 So.2d 1361 (Fla. 1980); Johnson v. State, 314 So.2d 573 (Fla. 1975).”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage“If we allowed the circuit judge to make pre-trial determinations of the death penalty's applicability, we would be modifying the death penalty's statutory scheme.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“no authority to interfere with the prosecutor's discretion in proceeding with [the] cause as a death penalty case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Horan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.