497 So. 2d 201 - Ex Parte State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
45 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently August 2001 · most notably 500 So. 2d 68 - Ex Parte State of Alabama (1986), 529 So. 2d 1029 - Bogan v. State (1988)
45 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 414 So. 2d 993 - Ex Parte Allen · 448 So. 2d 404 - Ex Parte Washington · 53 Ala. App. 657 - Smith v. State · Johnson v. Coker · 440 So. 2d 1237 - Giles v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No party may assign as error the court's . . . failing to give a written instruction, . . . unless he objects thereto . . ., stating the matter to which he objects and the grounds of his objection.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Parker v. State · Ex Parte Pettway“state with particularity the grounds of [his] objection.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“"[T]his Court amended Rule 51, Ala.R.Civ.P., effective March 1, 1984 , which was after the date of defendant's trial, to add the following sentence: 'Additional instructions shall be submitted in writing, except that with respect to any additional instruction taken from the Alabama Pattern Jury Instructions, it shall be sufficient to identify said instruction on the record by reference to the number and title of said pattern jury instruction.' No such amendment has been made to Temporary Rule 14, Ala.R.Crim.P. "”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Parker v. State · Ex Parte McCall
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.