497 So. 2d 296 - Griffis v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 476 So. 2d 158 - Albritton v. State · 487 So. 2d 1045 - State v. Whitfield · 476 So. 2d 161 - State v. Young · 482 So. 2d 311 - Florida Bar Re: Rules of Criminal Procedure · 491 So. 2d 1284 - Leopard v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“DOES A TRIAL COURT'S STATEMENT, MADE AT THE TIME OF DEPARTURE FROM THE SENTENCING GUIDELINES, THAT IT WOULD DEPART FOR ANY ONE OF THE REASONS GIVEN, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER BOTH VALID AND INVALID REASONS ARE FOUND ON REVIEW, SATISFY THE STANDARD SET FORTH IN ALBRITTON V. STATE?”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.