Sapp v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
September 1986
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 462 So. 2d 1037 - Vinzant v. State · 469 So. 2d 679 - Casher v. State · Laney v. State · 437 So. 2d 668 - Barnett v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"(a) A person commits the crime of robbery in the third degree if in the course of committing a theft he: "(1) Uses force against the person of the owner or any person present with intent to overcome his physical resistance or physical power of resistance; or "(2) Threatens the imminent use of force against the person of the owner or any person present with intent to compel acquiescence to the taking of or escaping with the property."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Sapp“embraces acts which occur... in immediate flight after the attempt or commission.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Sapp“black jacket which appeared to belong to Wal-Mart,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Sapp
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.