497 So. 2d 600 - Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 1993
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Garcia v. Ingram · 361 So. 2d 1106 - Chavers v. State · 363 So. 2d 1020 - Thomas v. State · Knight v. State · Wear v. Wear
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'The oral charge need not state the legal principle exactly as it appears in the requested charge. The principle expressed in the requested charge need only be fairly and substantially covered in the trial court's oral charge.' Tyson v. State , 361 So.2d 1182 , 1188 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[W]here not all of the State's case is derived from circumstantial evidence and where[, as in this case,] the requested charges do not call for a consideration of all the evidence,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Morrison v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.