497 So. 2d 607 - Chambers v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

cited by 25 later decisions

states following

February 2008

most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently February 2008 · most notably T.B. v. State (1997), 545 So. 2d 820 - Carr v. State (1989)

25 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · North Carolina v. Butler · Fare v. Michael C. · National Labor Relations Board v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n · 461 So. 2d 852 - Ex Parte Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“'[N]othing in Code 1975 § 12-15-58 et seq., precludes the transport of an arrested juvenile to a police department first before transfer to a juvenile facility.' Ex parte Talley , 483 So.2d 1372 (Ala. 1986). 'Alabama has no prohibition against a law enforcement officer arresting a juvenile for a delinquent act and taking the juvenile to the police station before the juvenile is either released or taken to probation services or an authorized detention facility.' Talley v. State , 483 So.2d 1369 , 1371 (Ala.Cr.App. 1985), cert. quashed, Ex parte Talley , 483 So.2d 1372 (Ala. 1986). 'We do not think that the purpose of the "with all possible speed”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. DMM v. State · D.M.M. v. State
“"The juvenile court's finding that Chambers was guilty of [one of the counts of] second degree theft ... is due to be reversed. "On December 18, 1985, the Lowndes County Middle School was burglarized. Four or five dollars in school office supplies were missing as were `some oranges and apples' valued at $8 and a teacher's purse, also valued at $8. "Theft of property in the second degree involves property with a value in excess of $25. Alabama Code 1975, § 13A-8-4(e). Since the State only proved that the total of all the missing property was $21, Chambers'[s] adjudication of guilty of theft in the second degree cannot stand. The record does show that Chambers is guilty of theft in the third degree. However, this would not affect Chambers['s] adjudication as a delinquent because he was also found guilty of other charges: third degree burglary and second degree theft ... and second degree theft...."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. P.J.B. v. State · 999 So. 2d 581 - PJB v. State
“Fare v. Michael C., 442 U.S. 707, 725 , 99 S.Ct. 2560, 2572 , 61 L.Ed.2d 197 (1979) (quoted in Chambers v. State, 497 So.2d 607, 609-10 (Ala.Cr.App.1986)); Jackson v. State, 516 So.2d 726, 745 (Ala.Cr.App. 1985)). See also Scott v. State, 501 So.2d at 1274 ; Whisenant v. State, 466 So.2d 995, 1000 (Ala.Cr.App.1984), reversed on other grounds, 466 So.2d 1006 (Ala. 1985).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 811 So. 2d 557 - Burgess v. State · 586 So. 2d 978 - Flowers v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.