Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 497 SO2D 838 - Burnette v. State

Burnette v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
June 1990
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Russell · Hampton v. United States · Corallo v. United States · San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez · West Virginia ex rel. Sublett v. Adams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"By 'predisposed' is meant that the accused is 'presently ready and willing to commit the crime. . . . [T]he predisposition which must be shown by the prosecution is a 'state of mind which readily responds to the opportunity furnished by the officer or his agent to commit the forbidden act for which the accused is charged.' [ United States v. ] Burkley , 591 F.2d [903] at 916 [D.C. Cir. 1978]. '[P]redisposition is, by definition, "the defendant's state of mind and inclinations before his initial exposure to government agents. " ' United States v. Kaminski , 703 F.2d 1004 , 1008 (7th Cir. 1983). "It is recognized that '[c]learly, one way of proving predisposition is to show that the defendant responded affirmatively to less than compelling inducement by the government agent.' Burkley , 591 F.2d at 916 . 'Prompt acquiescence shows predisposition' to commit the crime. [ United States v. ] Myers , 692 F.2d [823] at 842 [2d Cir. 1982]."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.