Nazari v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1320A (§ 1128b of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396 (§ 1900 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Tull v. United States · Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. IT-Davy · Federal Sign v. Texas Southern University · General Services v. Little-Tex Insulation · Wichita Falls State Hospital v. Taylor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is found responsible for a percentage of the harm for which relief is sought”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a defendant, settling person, or responsible third party”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the civil penalties that the state is seeking against the [Providers] do not qualify as damages or monetary relief as those terms were used in Reata. " 497 S.W.3d at 181 . Instead, that court said, the state sued for a civil penalty to "punish”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.