Commonwealth v. Tapp’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Beck v. State of Ohio · Gerstein v. Pugh · Workforce Development Cabinet v. Gaines · Hearn v. Commonwealth · Commonwealth, Central State Hospital v. Gray
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[p]ursuant to Kentucky Rule of Criminal Procedure (RCr) 2.06(1), a warrant has two objectives-arresting the defendant and bringing the defendant before the court. A warrant remains pending until both objectives have been met-the defendant has been arrested and the defendant has been brought before the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“provided no warrant issued by the court is pending against him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.