¶2Keith Stubblefield appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.151 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the *359record on appeal, and we find the motion court did not clearly err in denying Mov-ant’s motion. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mp. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015).
¶3. All rule references are to Missouri Supreme Court Rules (2015) unless otherwise indicated.
