Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 497 U.S. 376 - Georgia v. South Carolina

Georgia v. South Carolina’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
7
cited 7 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 4 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions (7 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2019 · most notably New Jersey v. New York (1998), Club Italia Soccer & Sports Organization, Inc. v. Charter Township of Shelby (2006)

12 federal appellate · 4 district · 9 state decisions

160199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Durfee v. Duke · Stern v. Board of Levee Commissioners · Martin v. Wilks · Tompkins v. Texas · Knight v. United Land Ass'n

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When the bed is changed by the natural and gradual processes known as erosion and accretion, the boundary follows the varying course of the stream.”); Nebraska v. Iowa, 143 U.S. 359 , 360, 12 S.Ct. 396 , 36 L.Ed. 186 (1892) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “was not caused by either of the adjoining States, but by the United States Army Corps of Engineers.'' Under the common law, a littoral owner, like the United States in the instant case,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “[L]ong acquiescence in the practical location of an interstate boundary, and possession in accordance therewith, often has been used as an aid in resolving boundary disputes”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.