← 498 F.2d 925 - Hays Livestock Commission Company, Inc., a Kansas Corporation v. Maly Livestock Commission Company, Inc., a Foreign Corporation, Universal Surety Company, a Foreign Corporation, Plainville Livestock Commission Company, Inc., a Kansas Corporation v. Maly Livestock Commission Company, Inc., a Foreign Corporation, Universal Surety Company, a Foreign Corporation, Rush County Sales Company, a Partnership Composed of Henry Reifschneider v. Maly Livestock Commission Company, Inc., a Foreign Corporation, Universal Surety Company, a Foreign Corporation

Hays Livestock Commission Company, Inc., a Kansas Corporation v. Maly Livestock Commission Company, Inc., a Foreign Corporation, Universal Surety Company, a Foreign Corporation, Plainville Livestock Commission Company, Inc., a Kansas Corporation v. Maly Livestock Commission Company, Inc., a Foreign Corporation, Universal Surety Company, a Foreign Corporation, Rush County Sales Company, a Partnership Composed of Henry Reifschneider v. Maly Livestock Commission Company, Inc., a Foreign Corporation, Universal Surety Company, a Foreign Corporation’s Empirical Analysis

498 F.2d 925 · 1974

Citation profile

cited by 18 later decisions

states following

July 2007

most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently July 2007

11 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Udall v. Tallman · Powell v. McCormack · Consolo v. Federal Maritime Commission · Trafficante v. Metropolitan Life Insurance · Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“Such suit in the district court shall proceed in all respects like other civil suits for damages except that the findings and orders of the Secretary shall be prima facie evidence of the facts therein stated, * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Rice v. Wilcox
“to comprehensively regulate packers, stockyards, marketing agents and dealers.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. London v. Fieldale Farms Corp.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.