Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 498 F.3d 1201 - Rash v. J.V. Intermediate, Ltd.

Rash v. J.V. Intermediate, Ltd.’s Empirical Analysis

498 F.3d 1201 · 2007

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2024

4 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

40200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kinzbach Tool Co. v. Corbett-Wallace Corp. · Johnson v. Brewer & Pritchard, P.C. · Associated Indemnity Corp. v. CAT Contracting, Inc. · Schlumberger Technology Corp. v. Swanson · Burrow v. Arce

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(allthough an employee does not owe an absolute duty of loyalty to his or her employer, at the very least, an employee's independent enterprise cannot compete or contract with the employer without the employer's full knowledge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “courts ... should be careful in defining the seope of the fiduciary obligations an employee owes when acting as the employer's agent in the pursuit of business opportunities,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “employee has a duty to deal openly with the employer and to fully disclose to the employer information about matters affecting the company's business.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.