Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 498 F.3d 185 - United States v. Lessner

United States v. Lessner’s Empirical Analysis

498 F.3d 185 · 2007

Citation profile

189
cited by 189 later decisions
June 2023
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 189 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably United States v. Starnes (2009), United States v. Merced (2010)

23 federal appellate · 4 district ·

1190200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 1519 (§ 802 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 2232 · 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663A (§ 204 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on United States v. Booker · United States v. Olano · Boykin v. Alabama · North Carolina v. Alford · Brady v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 189 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “For a sentence to be substantively reasonable, a district court must apply the § 3553(a) factors reasonably to the circumstances of the case. A sentence that falls within the recommended Guidelines range, while not presumptively reasonable, is less likely to be unreasonable than a sentence outside the range. The pertinent inquiry is whether the final sentence, wherever it may lie within the permissible statutory range, was premised upon appropriate and judicious consideration of the relevant factors.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.