Taylor v. Quarterman’s Empirical Analysis
498 F.3d 306 · 2007
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
October 2016
most recently cited
Relationships
Relies on Miller-El v. Cockrell Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division · Atkins v. Virginia · Ex Parte Briseno · In re Salazar · In re Hearn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The administrator of the test thought Taylor was capable of performing better than 75. While Taylor's expert concluded that this test result overstated Taylor's IQ by seven points, the trial court was not unreasonable in finding otherwise.”). In Bri-seño, the trial court determined that the most accurate measurements of IQ yielded results of 72 and 74. The TCCA quoted and adopted the trial court’s finding that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Moore v. Quarterman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.