Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 498 F.3d 434 - Lindsay v. Yates

Lindsay v. Yates’s Empirical Analysis

498 F.3d 434 · 2007

Citation profile

67
cited by 67 later decisions
October 2021
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently October 2021 · most notably Aktieselskabet Af 21. November 2001 v. Fame Jeans Inc. (2008), White v. Baxter Healthcare Corp. (2008)

15 federal appellate · 1 district ·

460200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 1982 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 3603 (§ 803 of the Fair Housing Act (Title VIII, Civil Rights Act of 1968)) · 42 U.S.C. § 3604 (§ 804 of the Fair Housing Act (Title VIII, Civil Rights Act of 1968))

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Conley v. Gibson · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Erickson v. Pardus

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is the general rule that a federal appellate court does not consider an issue not passed upon below.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he legal standards for adjudicating Rule 12(b)(6) and Rule 12(c) motions are the same....”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[Plaintiffs] allege that the Yateses advertised their house for sale, that they (the Lindsays) executed a purchase agreement to buy the house, and that nearly two weeks after signing the purchase agreement and depositing $500 in earnest money with Brent Yates— and one day after Brent learned they were black — the Yateses terminated the contract.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.