Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 498 F.3d 561 - Bryson v. Regis Corp.

Bryson v. Regis Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

498 F.3d 561 · 2007

Citation profile

114
cited by 114 later decisions
1
states following
May 2021
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 114 later decisions — most recently May 2021 · most notably Seeger v. Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. (2012), Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Chevron Phillips Chemical Co. (2009)

13 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions

920200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 2601 (§ 2 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 29 U.S.C. § 2611 (§ 101 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 29 U.S.C. § 2612 (§ 102 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 29 U.S.C. § 2614 (§ 104 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 42 U.S.C. § 12102 (§ 3 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks · Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 114 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an illness, injury, impairment, or physical or mental condition that involves ... continuing treatment by a health care provider.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The 'entitlement' or 'interference' theory”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “theory arises from § 2615(a)(1), which prohibits an employer from interfering with an employee's exercise of her FMLA rights or wrongfully denying those rights, and requires the employer to restore the employee to the same or an equivalent position upon her return from FMLA leave. Id. The”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.