C & E SERVICES, INC. v. Ashland, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
20 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably 689 F. Supp. 2d 94 - Sloan Ex Rel. Juergens v. Urban Title Services, Inc. (2010), 857 F. Supp. 2d 67 - Howard University v. Watkins (2012)
20 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Field v. Mans · Laningham v. United States Navy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the defendant made a false representation; (2) in reference to a material fact; (3) with knowledge of its falsity; (4) with the intent to deceive the plaintiff; (5) the plaintiff acted in reasonable reliance on that representation; (6) which consequently resulted in provable damages.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]n the District of Columbia, a 'defendant's challenged conduct is the proximate cause of a plaintiff's injury only if the injury is the natural and probable consequence of the negligence or wrongful act and ought to [have been] foreseen in light of the circumstances.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[O]nly in exceptional cases will questions of ... proximate cause pass from the realm of fact to the one of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.