Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 498 N.E.2d 105 - Calvert v. State

Calvert v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
3
states following
October 2020
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently October 2020

12 state decisions

4019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. State · Stout v. State · Jones v. State · 166 Ind. App. 133 - Stein v. State · 173 Ind. App. 606 - Singleton v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “...a trial judge must disqualify himself from a proceeding in which he has actively served as an attorney for one of the parties regardless of whether actual bias or prejudice exists.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “C. Disqualification (1) A judge should disqualify himself in a proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned, including but not limited to instances where: [[Image here]] (b) he served as lawyer in the matter in controversy, or a lawyer with whom he previously practiced law served during such association as a lawyer concerning the matter, or the judge or such lawyer has been a material witness concerning it; [[Image here]]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “If a complaining party sits idly by and awaits the outcome of the proceedings after receiving knowledge of facts that require a trial judge's disqualification, or after the cireumstances or law creates a presumption of such knowledge, he will be held to have waived the disqualification and consented to trial by the judge presiding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.