Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 498 Pa. 656 - Commonwealth v. Bennett

Commonwealth v. Bennett’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
November 2013
most recently cited

21 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Harris v. New York · Commonwealth v. Davenport · Commonwealth v. Triplett · Commonwealth v. Blady · 287 Pa. Super. 485 - Commonwealth v. Bennett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A prophylactic rule, such as the six hour rule, is a classic of technicality. Classic because it applies to all circumstances, no matter what distinctions of justice may inhere in the facts of a given case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “. . . delay of more than six hours should not per se render . . . prearraignment statement inadmissible.. .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.