Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 498 SO2D 1197 - State v. Logan

State v. Logan’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 1992
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Smith · 471 So. 2d 701 - State v. Cann · 374 So. 2d 1195 - State v. Spencer · 406 So. 2d 550 - State v. Bourgeois · 412 So. 2d 1294 - State v. Trahan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the defendant is convicted of two or more offenses based on the same act or transaction, or constituting parts of a common scheme or plan, the terms of imprisonment shall be served concurrently unless the court expressly directs that some or all be served consecutively. Other sentences of imprisonment shall be served consecutively unless the court expressly directs that some or all of them be served concurrently. In the case of the concurrent sentence, the judge shall specify, and the court minutes shall reflect, the date from which the sentences are to run concurrently.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.