Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 498 So. 2d 1328 - Grantham v. Gunter

498 So. 2d 1328 - Grantham v. Gunter’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently September 2017

4 state decisions

201986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Goldberg v. Kelly · Fuentes v. Shevin · Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroy · Bowling v. Department of Ins.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The department shall immediately temporarily suspend any license issued under this chapter when the licensee has been charged with a felony or a crime involving moral turpitude or a crime punishable by imprisonment of 1 year or more under the law of any state, territory, or country. Such suspension shall continue if the licensee has been found guilty of, or has pleaded guilty or no contest to, the crime, whether or not a judgment or conviction has been entered, during a pending appeal. (emphasis supplied).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]hile it may be true that a bail bondsman's livelihood depends on his retaining his license, he does not obtain his license on the basis of his need for income, but because he fills certain other qualifications.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.