498 So. 2d 1373 - Jennings v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 467 So. 2d 998 - Florida Bar v. Hawkins · 459 So. 2d 1098 - Cuthbert v. State · 468 So. 2d 220 - Florida Bar: Amendment to Rules of Criminal Procedure (3.701, 3.988—Sentencing Guidelines) · 461 So. 2d 277 - Dominguez v. State · 483 So. 2d 549 - Affordable Homes, Inc. v. Devil's Run, Ltd.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If an offender is convicted under an enhancement statute, the reclassified degree should be used as the basis for scoring the primary offense in the appropriate category. If the offender is sentenced under section 775.084 (habitual offender), the maximum allowable sentence is increased as provided by the operation of that statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“shall be punishable as if it were reclassified upward as an offense of the next higher degree.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.