498 So. 2d 384 - Hampton v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 2011
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 64 Cal. 2d 504 - People v. Leal · Nelms & Blum Co. v. Fink · Moreau v. State · 8 Md. App. 439 - Frasher v. State · Judd v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he statute requires no minimum amount in order to constitute a crime.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“amount of illegal drugs is sufficient to support a conviction. Id. ¶ 15. In Hampton , the prosecution met its burden of proving the defendant's knowing possession of a controlled substance. The police officer who pulled over Hampton witnessed him staggering and acting disoriented. The officer patted Hampton down, as he testified at trial,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hudson v. State“which later was identified as pentazocine (commonly known as Talwin), a Schedule II controlled substance. The officer asked Hampton if he would take a breath test, and without asking Hampton any other questions, Hampton”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hudson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.