498 So. 2d 668 - Thomas v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 1993
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 443 So. 2d 973 - Clark v. State · 431 So. 2d 177 - Wright v. Wright · 433 So. 2d 682 - Thornton v. Thornton · 463 So. 2d 1248 - State v. Haynes · 475 So. 2d 912 - Bei v. Harper
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The provision in Rule 9.200(f)(2) relied upon by the appellant ... does not encompass a situation where there is an absence of record below, as opposed to a failure by the parties to include parts of an extant record below in the record on appeal. If a record exists below that is needed to complete the appellate record, then this court cannot determine the cause without affording a party the opportunity to supply the omitted part of the record. But if no record was created in the first place either by court reporting or a submitted statement per Rule 9.200(b)(3) then there is no obligation on this court's part to afford a party on appeal a second opportunity to create a record simply because he ignored the rule the first time around. See Beasley v. Beasley, 463 So.2d 1248 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). [Emphasis in original].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.