Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 498 So. 2d 698 - State v. Hilton

498 So. 2d 698 - State v. Hilton’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
July 2011
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently July 2011

7 state decisions

301986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schmerber v. State of California · Filmon v. Florida · 336 So. 2d 586 - Filmon v. State · State v. Mitchell · 456 So. 2d 916 - Jackson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(c) Any person whose consent is implied as provided in this section shall be deemed to have consented to an approved blood test for the purpose of determining the alcoholic content of the blood or a blood test for the purpose of determining the presence of chemical substances or controlled substances as provided herein if such person appears for treatment at a hospital, clinic, or other medical facility as a result of his involvement as a driver in a motor vehicle accident and the administration of a breath or urine test is impractical or impossible. The blood test shall be performed in a reasonable manner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “We note that, unlike breath or urine tests, a blood test administered pursuant to section 316.1932(1)(c) need not be incidental to a lawful arrest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “implied from reading section 316.1932(1)(c) together with section 316.1932(1)(a).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.