498 So. 2d 701 - State v. Mayeux’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 49 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably State v. Sanders (1994), 713 So. 2d 588 - State v. Bailey (1998)
1 federal appellate · 49 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Burks v. United States · United States v. Jorn · 385 So. 2d 248 - State v. Byrd · 365 So. 2d 1319 - State v. Marse
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... bar retrial when a jury's verdict, containing a nonwaivable defect, must be set aside by an appellate court.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“error patent on the face of the record and therefore reviewable on appeal despite absence of an objection during trial.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ford · State v. Robinson“If the court finds that the verdict is incorrect in form or is not responsive to the indictment, it shall refuse to receive it, and shall remand the jury with the necessary oral instructions. In such a case the court shall read the verdict, and record the reasons for refusal.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.