Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 498 So. 2d 788 - Beavers v. State

498 So. 2d 788 - Beavers v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably Taylor v. State (1996), 550 So. 2d 406 - Smith v. State (1989)

44 state decisions

2301986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · United States v. Marion · Baker v. McCollan · United States v. Gonzalez · 419 So. 2d 194 - Clay Bohn Chrysler, Inc. v. Lizana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No mathematical formula exists according to which the Barker weighing and balancing process must be performed. The weight to be given each factor necessarily turns on the quality of evidence available on each and, in the absence of evidence, identification of the party with the risk of nonpersuasion. In the end, no one factor is dispositive. The totality of the circumstances must be considered.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] defendant has no duty to bring himself to trial.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “in favor of the prosecution (or in the absence of the defendant's position on the other Barker factors being weak)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.