Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

498 So. 2d 923

498 So.2d 923

11 Fla.L.Weekly 641

Docket No. 69568.

Lemon v. State

George LEMON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 11, 1986.

Rehearing Denied January 5, 1987.

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1986-12-11

Relies on Dufour v. Mississippi · 456 So. 2d 885 - Lemon v. State · 461 So. 2d 1354 - O'CALLAGHAN v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1986-12-11

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably 761 So. 2d 1055 - Freeman v. State (2000), 91 Md. App. 346 - Parker v. Columbia Bank (1992)

4 federal appellate · 2 district · 27 state decisions

2701986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Larry Helm Spalding, Capital Collateral Representative, Mark E. Olive, Litigation Director, Billy H. Nolas and Lissa J. Gardner, Office of the Capital Collateral Representative, Tallahassee, for appellant.

¶2Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Katherine V. Blanco and Peggy A. Quince, Asst. Attys. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4George Lemon, a state prisoner for whom a death warrant has been signed, appeals the circuit court's denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. We granted a stay of execution and now reverse the trial court's order and remand for an evidentiary hearing.

¶5We previously affirmed appellant's conviction for first-degree murder and sentence of death. See Lemon v. State,456 So.2d 885 (Fla. 1984), cert. denied,469 U.S. 1230, 105 S.Ct. 1233, 84 L.Ed.2d 370 (1985).

¶6It is clear that appellant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing unless "the motion and the files and records in the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850; State v. Crews,477 So.2d 984 (Fla. 1985); O'Callaghan v. State,461 So.2d 1354 (Fla. 1984). Having reviewed appellant's motion, files and record, we find that his allegations are sufficient to require an evidentiary hearing. Accordingly, we remand to the circuit court for further proceedings consistent herewith. The stay of execution issued November 4, 1986, is hereby dissolved.

¶7It is so ordered.

¶8ADKINS, OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW and BARKETT, JJ., concur.

¶9McDONALD, C.J., and BOYD, J., dissent.

/498/so2d/923 · .json · Public domain