Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 498 SW2D 206 - Haas v. State

Haas v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
1
states following
December 1997
most recently cited

42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently December 1997 · most notably Guerra v. State (1988), Easley v. State (1978)

42 state decisions

180197319801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · United States v. Marion · Dickey v. Florida · Martin v. State · Terry v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “At the request of either party, the witnesses on both sides may be sworn and placed in the custody of an officer and removed out of the courtroom to some place where they cannot hear the testimony as delivered by any other witness in the cause. This is termed placing witness under the rule.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he prime condition on admissibility of a photograph is that it be identified by a witness as an accurate portrayal of certain facts relevant to the issue, and verified by such witness on personal knowledge as a correct representation of those facts, (emphasis added).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The ultimate test when a witness who has violated the rule has been allowed to testify is whether or not there has been injury to the defendant. Two relevant criteria are: 1) did the witness actually hear the testimony of the other witness, and 2) did the witness’ testimony contradict the testimony of the witness that he allegedly heard.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.