Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 498 U.S. 192 - Cheek v. United States

Cheek v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

2,563
cited by 2,563 later decisions
30
cited 30 times by the Supreme Court
31
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

1,373 federal appellate · 123 district · 214 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 2,563 later decisions (30 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2025 · most notably Ratzlaf et Ux United States (1994), Staples v. United States (1994)

1,373 federal appellate · 123 district · 214 state decisions — followed in 31 states

1.1k01991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedUnited States v. Cheek (from Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Morissette v. United States · Hamling v. United States · Sandstrom v. Montana · William Marbury v. James Madison · Crowell v. Benson

Cited together with Ratzlaf et Ux United States · United States v. Pomponio · Spies v. United States · Bryan v. United States · United States v. Bishop

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2,563 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “defendant knew of the duty purportedly imposed by the provision of the statute or regulation he is accused of violating”
    78 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “voluntary, intentional violation of a known legal duty.”
    36 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he proliferation of statutes and regulations has sometimes made it difficult for the average citizen to know and comprehend the extent of the duties and obligations imposed by the tax laws.”
    25 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.