Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 498 U.S. 430 - Lozada v. Deeds

Lozada v. Deeds’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

944
cited by 944 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
October 2025
most recently cited

94 federal appellate · 18 district · 758 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 944 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2025 · most notably Simms v. Warden, State Prison (1994), Simms v. Warden (1994)

94 federal appellate · 18 district · 758 state decisions

43601991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Barefoot v. Estelle · Ohio v. Kentucky · Rodriquez v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 944 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must demonstrate that the issues are debatable among jurists of reason; that a court could resolve the issues [in a different manner]; or that the questions are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “make a substantial showing of the denial of [a] federal right”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The District Court rested its analysis on the prejudice prong of the Strickland inquiry and that was presumably the basis for the Court of Appeals’ decision to deny a certificate of probable cause. We believe the issue of prejudice caused by the alleged denial of the right to appeal could be resolved in a different manner than the one followed by the District Court. Since Strickland at least two Courts of Appeals have presumed prejudice in this situation. See Abels v. Kaiser, 913 F.2d 821 , 823 (CA10 1990); Estes v. United States, 883 F.2d 645 , 649 (CA8 1989); see also Rodriquez v. United States, 395 U.S. 327 , 330, 89 S.Ct. 1715 , 1717, 23 L.Ed.2d 340 (1969).”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.